I’ve always found book to screen adaptations rather hit and miss. There are some that I’ve loved – The Shawshank Redemption and I am Legend, for example. And those I’ve regretted seeing, like The Runaway Jury.
So, as a fan of Lee Child’s fabulous character Jack Reacher, I had mixed feelings about watching the new JACK REACHER film.
Would it live up to the book (one of my favorite of the series)?
Could Tom Cruise really play the ‘larger-than-life’ character of Reacher?
But I was curious to see the film, and so last night I ventured off to the cinema to view it.
And I liked it.
It was true enough to the book and the character for me to recognise them, the action was slick, and the pace kept moving (and me interested). And it didn’t matter that Tom Cruise’s Reacher didn’t look exactly as I’d pictured Reacher in my mind as I read the books. The character was there, just a bit different. For me it worked.
I wonder if they’ll make another one?
I hope they do.
- Movie Corner: Jack Reacher (usdailyreview.com)
2 thoughts on “Book to Film: the same, but different?”
I heard Lee Child talk about the film and if he as the author is happy about it, then that’s a good sign. I know Cruise has had a lot of stick for not being what people think Reacher should be, but it sounds like it’s actually been a good film. I’m glad you enjoyed it.
Yes, great point. Are you thinking of seeing it?